Instruction latency analysis usually focuses on performance
optimization—making code run as fast as possible. The Assembly Hall of Shame takes the opposite approach: searching for the absolute floor of
single-instruction performance.

Strategy: Use fxrstor64 to load 512-byte FPU/MMX/XMM state from a
high-latency MMIO region in the PCIe fabric, then starve the fabric while the
load is in flight — a fleet of hammer cores pounds a different high-latency
MMIO register with tight 4-byte reads, saturating the PCIe root complex and
endpoint with non-posted transactions, so CPU 0's 512-byte fxrstor64 must
queue behind all that contending traffic.

Contender: AMD Ryzen 7 5800H

; CPU 0 — timed instruction movl $0xfcc68830, %rsi fxrstor64 %rsi ; CPUs 1..N — hammer loop against a different high-latency location movl 0xfcc68858, %eax
🏆 Score: 198,002,498,236 cycles

🏆 Time: 62 seconds

A spec-violating unaligned ymm0 load that forced non-posted dword transactions from stalled GPU registers was used to break the fundamental design of System Management Mode in smiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii.

vmovdqu 0xfcc003b1, %ymm0- Instructions may use whatever setup is necessary, but only a single instruction is eligible to be scored.
- Trapped/emulated/virtualized instructions may only time the trap, not the handler.
- Instructions must not be interruptible. rep movs,pause, etc. are disqualified.
- Times are normalized based on the CPU base clock frequency.
- All platforms must be in their factory stock configurations - no hardware modifications.

Strategy: nop does nothing. It opens the leaderboard accordingly.

Contender: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-8559U CPU @ 2.70GHz

nop
Score: 1 cycles

Time: 0 nanoseconds

Strategy: Regular nop was too short, but how do we make nothing take
longer? Try a lonnnnnng nop.

Contender: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-8559U CPU @ 2.70GHz

data16 data16 data16 data16 data16 data16 data16 nopl 0x00000000(%%eax,%%eax,1)
Score: 20 cycles

Time: 7 nanoseconds

Strategy: Just a reference instruction to get our bearings.

Contender: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-8559U CPU @ 2.70GHz

rdtscScore: 49 cycles

Time: 18 nanoseconds

Strategy: Use 128-bit dividend (rdx:rax=2:0) with small divisor to push the
quotient above the ceiling imposed by sign-extension, driving the longest path
through the divider microcode.

Contender: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-8559U CPU @ 2.70GHz

xorq %rax, %rax ; rax = 0 (low 64 bits of dividend) movq $2, %rdx ; rdx = 2 (high 64 bits: full dividend = 2^65) movq $5, %rbx ; divisor → quotient = 2^65/5 ≈ 7.4×10^18 idivq %rbx
Score: 77 cycles

Time: 28 nanoseconds

Strategy: Use maximum nesting depth (31) to force 30 display-pointer loads
and pushes through the microcode display-walk path.

Contender: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-8559U CPU @ 2.70GHz

enter $0, $31 ; 0 bytes allocated, nesting depth 31 (maximum)Score: 112 cycles

Time: 41 nanoseconds

Strategy: Try a small denormal to trigger an FP microcode assist.

Contender: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-8559U CPU @ 2.70GHz

movabsq $0x0000000000000001, %rax movq %rax, -8(%rsp) fldl -8(%rsp)
Score: 133 cycles

Time: 49 nanoseconds

Strategy: Just ensure the cache line is dirty.

Contender: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-8559U CPU @ 2.70GHz

clflush (%rax) ; rax -> dirty cache line resident in L3Score: 165 cycles

Time: 60 nanoseconds

Strategy: Use exponent 0x7ff to reach 'special value' processing in
microcode; positive/negative, NaN/inf doesn't seem to make a difference, go with
QNaN.

Contender: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-8559U CPU @ 2.70GHz

movabsq $0x7fffffffffffffff, %rax movq %rax, -8(%rsp) fldl -8(%rsp) fsin
Score: 257 cycles

Time: 94 nanoseconds

Strategy: Saturate all write-combining line-fill buffers with movnti
stores to distinct cache lines, forcing mfence to drain the full LFB write
path to the uncore before retiring.

Contender: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-8559U CPU @ 2.70GHz

movnti %r9, 0*64(%rdi) ; ×16 distinct cache lines — saturate the write-combining LFBs ; … movnti %r9, 15*64(%rdi) mfence ; must drain all pending LFB writes before retiring
Score: 326 cycles

Time: 120 nanoseconds

Strategy: Nothing for now, just check how long it takes to invalidate the
TLB.

Contender: AMD Ryzen 7 5800H with Radeon Graphics (Trigkey S5)

mov %rax, %cr3Score: 352 cycles

Time: 110 nanoseconds

Strategy: Hit x87 FP microcode assist path by using denormal source operand.

Contender: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-8559U CPU @ 2.70GHz

fldl subnorm ; 1e-310: value < DBL_MIN, biased exponent = 0 faddl subnorm ; source is subnormal → FP microcode assist
Score: 677 cycles

Time: 249 nanoseconds

Strategy: Align lock-prefixed operand to straddle cache-line
boundary, forcing CPU to assert the external bus lock rather than using the fast
MESI cache-coherence path.

Contender: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-8559U CPU @ 2.70GHz

; split_ptr % 64 == 63 — dword spans bytes 63 (line N) and 64–66 (line N+1) lock xaddl %r9d, (%rdi)
Score: 865 cycles

Time: 319 nanoseconds

Strategy: Use subnormal divisor, hardware hands control to microcode
assist, assist normalizes operand, performs the division, then restores
architectural state.

Contender: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-8559U CPU @ 2.70GHz

movabsq $0x3ff0000000000000, %rax ; 1.0 (normal dividend) movq %rax, -8(%rsp) fldl -8(%rsp) ; ST(0) = 1.0 movabsq $0x0000002000000000, %rax ; 6.79e-313 (subnormal divisor) movq %rax, -8(%rsp) fdivl -8(%rsp) ; ST(0) = 1.0 / subnormal → FP assist
Score: 883 cycles

Time: 325 nanoseconds

Strategy: Use rakefield to find
the highest latency CPUID leaves.

Contender: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-8559U CPU @ 2.70GHz

movl $6, %eax cpuid
Score: 1248 cycles

Time: 460 nanoseconds

Strategy: Execute in a tight loop to deplete the hardware entropy pool faster than it can be refilled, forcing subsequent calls to stall while the entropy source recovers.

Contender: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-8559U CPU @ 2.70GHz

rdrand %raxScore: 5,579 cycles

Time: 2.057 microseconds

Strategy: Use project:nightshyft
to identify high latency MSRs. MCG_CTL on Zen look like a winner: may be a
microcode quiesce and synchronize on MCA error banks across hardware units, some
potentially off-die, requiring fabric-level communication rather than a simple
local register write.

Contender: AMD Ryzen 7 5800H with Radeon Graphics (Trigkey S5)

movl $0x17b, %ecx ; MCG_CTL wrmsr
Score: 34,304 cycles

Time: 10.742 microseconds

Strategy: Target an I/O port that straddles a NIC device register boundary,
triggering the device to quiesce its TX DMA engine on each write.

Contender: AMD Ryzen 7 5800H with Radeon Graphics (Trigkey S5)

mov $0xf019, %dx outl %eax, %dx
Score: 49,857 cycles

Time: 15.580 microseconds

Strategy: Use project:nightshyft
to identify high latency model-specific-registers: VIA uses an undocumented
register at 0x133 that gives wildly high response time. No idea what it does.

Contender: VIA Eden Processor 800MHz

movl $0x133, %ecx ; undocumented MSR rdmsr
Score: 161,602 cycles

Time: 202.004 microseconds

Strategy: Fully load L1/L2/L3 caches with dirty lines to force DRAM
writeback of entire hierarchy.

Contender: AMD Ryzen 7 5800H with Radeon Graphics (Trigkey S5)

wbinvdScore: 1,616,480 cycles

Time: 506.165 microseconds

Strategy: Target I/O port mapped to an ACPI PM block where an unaligned
4-byte read decodes into multiple non-posted loads from wherever this port goes.

Contender: AMD Ryzen 7 5800H with Radeon Graphics (Trigkey S5)

mov $0x0413, %dx inl %dx, %eax
Score: 12,524,415 cycles

Time: 3.921769 milliseconds

Strategy: Use mmiotic to identify
high-latency deadspace in PCIe fabric, hit unkown GPU register.

Contender: AMD Ryzen 7 5800H with Radeon Graphics (Trigkey S5)

movl 0xfcc003b0, %esiScore: 443,937,696 cycles

Time: 139.010268 milliseconds

Strategy: Search MMIO space for slowest registers in PCIe fabric, hit
unknown GPU register, use 8-byte MMIO read to get two dword register accesses,
which isn't technically allowed but works anyway.

Contender: AMD Ryzen 7 5800H with Radeon Graphics (Trigkey S5)

movq 0xfcc003b0, %raxScore: 887,716,864 cycles

Time: 277.971228 milliseconds

Strategy: Search MMIO space for slowest registers in PCIe fabric, hit
unknown GPU register, use 16-byte MMIO read to get four dword register accesses,
which isn't technically allowed but works anyway.

Contender: AMD Ryzen 7 5800H with Radeon Graphics (Trigkey S5)

vmovdqu 0xfcc003b0, %xmm0Score: 1,774,555,776 cycles

Time: 555.664133 milliseconds

Strategy: Search MMIO space for slowest registers in PCIe fabric, hit
unknown GPU register, use 32-byte MMIO read to get eight dword register
accesses, which still isn't technically allowed but works anyway.

Contender: AMD Ryzen 7 5800H with Radeon Graphics (Trigkey S5)

vmovdqu 0xfcc003b0, %ymm0Score: 3,549,079,296 cycles

Time: 1.111345034 s

Strategy: Search MMIO space for slowest registers in PCIe fabric, hit
unknown GPU register, use 32-byte unaligned MMIO read to get nine dword
register accesses, which is even less allowed than the aligned version, but
works anyway.

Contender: AMD Ryzen 7 5800H with Radeon Graphics (Trigkey S5)

vmovdqu 0xfcc003b1, %ymm0Score: 4,453,212,256 cycles

Time: 1.394428818 seconds

Strategy: Use mmiotic to identify
high-latency deadspace in PCIe fabric, isolate region near 0's and offset state
to avoid MXCSR corruption (possibly VGA buffer?), use fxrstor64 to load 512-byte
FPU/MMX/XMM state from MMIO, forcing CPU to process 512 bytes of I/O
transactions through slowest available memory aperture.

Contender: AMD Ryzen 7 5800H

movl $0xfcc68830, %rsi fxrstor64 %rsi
Score: 74,584,168,512 cycles

Time: 23.354502677 seconds

Strategy: Extend fxrstor64 (baseline) by starving the fabric while the
load is in flight — a fleet of hammer cores pounds a different high-latency
MMIO register with tight 4-byte reads, saturating the PCIe root complex and
endpoint with non-posted transactions, so CPU 0's 512-byte fxrstor64 must queue
behind all that contending traffic.

Contender: AMD Ryzen 7 5800H with Radeon Graphics (Trigkey S5)

; CPU 0 — timed instruction movl $0xfcc68830, %rsi fxrstor64 %rsi ; CPUs 1..N — hammer loop against a different high-latency location movl 0xfcc68858, %eax
🏆 Score: 198,002,498,236 cycles

🏆 Time: 62 seconds

Strategy: Leverage extended AVX state in Sapphire Rapids with MMIO approach
from fxrstor64: xsave state area is 8KB vs 512 bytes, 16x size ->
1,000,000,000,000 cycles

Contender: TODO

; XCR0 must enable AMX components (bits 17-18); state area ~8KB xrstor64 (%rsi) ; rsi -> MMIO region, same technique as fxrstor64
- T.B.D.

  • T.B.D.

The assembly hall-of-shame is a research effort from Christopher Domas (@xoreaxeaxeax).