In today's interview, we are sitting down with Christopher M. Kuhn to discuss BRAWLITICS, a non-partisan platform engineered to lower political polarization. By forcing users to read side-by-side political stances before unlocking daily voting pools, the platform is creating a safer, data-backed space for balanced civic discourse.
What does BRAWLITICS do? And why is now the time for it to exist?
Brawlitics is a non-partisan platform engineered to break echo chambers and lower political polarization. By presenting breaking news through structured, side-by-side Republican and Democratic stances, it forces safe, balanced civic discourse. Users must read both "corners" to unlock daily voting pools, allowing everyday citizens to discover opposing views objectively. It replaces toxic commentary with real-time, data-backed voting splits to measure true public sentiment. Now’s a good time for BRAWLITICS to exist because political polarization is at an all-time high, and everyday citizens desperately need a structured, algorithm-free environment to discover objective viewpoints without the toxic noise of traditional social media.
What is your traction to date? How many people does BRAWLITICS reach?
Brawlitics is growing its initial active base, currently driving highly sticky daily engagement. Rather than focusing on passive, low-value impressions, our primary reach metric centers on active session interactions. Each daily "undercard matchup" successfully captures between 300 to over 700 real-time votes ("in the ring" participants) per bout. With multiple live matchups running concurrently, the platform captures thousands of verifiably active, human-driven data points monthly from a highly retained audience checking back for daily results.
Who does your BRAWLITICS serve? What’s exciting about your users and customers?
Brawlitics is engineered for everyday citizens, political independents, and news consumers who feel alienated by mainstream media echo chambers and want a safe, objective environment for discovery. It serves individuals looking to break out of confirmation bias by evaluating policy cleanly from both angles. Additionally, political analysts and researchers gain significant value from the platform's clean, unpolluted data splits, which reflect genuine public sentiment on breaking topics without the toxic noise, comment sections, or manipulation common on traditional social networks.
What technologies were used in the making of BRAWLITICS? And why did you choose ones most essential to your techstack?
BRAWLITICS is built entirely on a modern, high-performance stack utilizing Next.js (React) for server-side rendering and Tailwind CSS for a responsive, mobile-first design. For the backend, the platform relies heavily on Supabase and PostgreSQL, employing real-time listeners to stream live voting updates securely. This specific infrastructure was chosen because it perfectly powers the efficient content archival pipeline needed to cycle and preserve the daily "undercard matchups" without performance bottlenecks.
What is traction to date for BRAWLITICS? Around the web, who’s been noticing?
BRAWLITICS has successfully transitioned from a conceptual MVP to a live, highly engaging deployment that demonstrates strong real-time user retention. Driven by a multi-source news ingestion engine, recent daily bouts have successfully captured hundreds of active, human-verified votes within their 24-hour limits with minimal drop-off. Users are consistently returning to unlock sealed results, showcasing a promising product-market fit among citizens actively seeking balanced political discourse.
Honestly, a 42 feels incredibly motivating and right where we want to be at this stage. It validates that our core engine, the dual-perspective framework and the unpolluted voting loops, is fundamentally solving a massive real-world problem. It shows we aren't just building another social echo chamber; we've engineered something that genuinely forces active critical thinking. At the same time, it leaves the perfect amount of runway for us to scale. We know where our growth vectors are, and we're looking forward to driving that score even higher over the next 12 months as our daily matchups continue to gain traction.
What excites you about this BRAWLITICS's potential usefulness? *
Brawlitics addresses a critical, systemic problem in modern society: the polarization of digital media. I am incredibly excited about its potential to act as a scalable, algorithmic antidote to echo chambers. By completely decoupling news discovery from toxic, high-conflict comment sections and replacing them with a strict, dual-perspective "read-to-unlock-vote" framework, Brawlitics creates a safe blueprint for healthy civic discourse. It doesn't just display data to passive consumers; it forces active critical thinking, breaks confirmation bias by making both Republican and Democratic perspectives visible, and captures an unpolluted, real-time pulse of true public sentiment across the country.
Walk us through your most concrete evidence of usefulness. Not vanity metrics or projections - what's the one data point that proves people genuinely need what you've built?
Our most concrete evidence of usefulness isn't page views or sign-ups, it's the active voter conversion rate within our dual-perspective framework.
On BRAWLITICS, a user cannot just glance at a headline and cast a quick, reactive vote. The platform requires them to actively click through and read both the structured Republican and Democratic "corners" to unlock the daily voting pool. Despite this intentional friction, we consistently see between 300 to over 700 real-time, human-verified votes per individual 24-hour bout.
In a digital landscape notorious for short attention spans and passive scrolling, the fact that hundreds of citizens daily are willing to deliberately slow down, evaluate both sides of a polarized issue, and stick around to complete the interaction is the ultimate proof of utility. It proves that everyday people are exhausted by traditional echo chambers and are actively seeking a structured, objective space to engage with the news.
How do you measure genuine user adoption versus "tourists" who sign up but never return? What's your retention story?
We separate genuine adoption from "tourist" sign-ups by measuring our Return-to-Unlock Rate.
Because BRAWLITICS relies on ephemeral daily "undercard matchups" that close within a strict 24-hour window, the results of a vote are sealed until the bout concludes. Tourists might stumble onto the page, vote once out of curiosity, and leave. Our core adopters, however, display a highly sticky behavior pattern: they actively return to the platform the following day to check the final data splits and unlock the next live matchup.
Our retention story is built entirely around this daily curiosity loop. Instead of chasing vanity registration metrics that look good on paper but result in dead accounts, we track how many users maintain consecutive daily voting streaks. The data shows that once a user completes three voting cycles, they transition from a casual observer to a highly retained participant who relies on BRAWLITICS as a daily, objective news checkpoint.
If we re-score your project in 12 months, which criterion will show the biggest improvement, and what are you doing right now to make that happen?
In 12 months, our "Usefulness at Scale" and volume metrics will show the most dramatic leap. Right now, we’ve successfully proven the micro-mechanics of the platform, as we know that the dual-perspective framework works and that our core audience is highly sticky. The immediate challenge isn't validation anymore; it's distribution.
To make that happen right now, we are focusing on two core tracks:
- Optimizing the Content Archival and Ingestion Engine: We are tightening our backend infrastructure on Supabase to support a much higher throughput of concurrent, localized, and niche "undercard matchups" without losing the snappy, real-time feel of the voting splits.
- Building Viral Loop Elements: We are engineering clean, data-rich sharing modules that allow users to instantly export a snapshot of a completed bout’s voting splits to traditional social media networks. By turning our unique data insights into shareable content, we will turn every closed poll into a organic growth vector that brings thousands of new daily active voters into the ring.
How Did You Hear About HackerNoon? Share With Us About Your Experience With HackerNoon.
I found HackerNoon by reading an article another user on X posted about their new project and I thought it was the perfect place to introduce Brawlitics.com to the world. It's a wonderful opportunity to share what you're building that will actually help people and let others get to hear about not just your "what" but also your "why"; which some would argue is even more important.
You mentioned capturing up to 700 real-time votes per daily bout. How do you plan to scale these "undercard matchups" to reach tens of thousands of active daily voters?
Scaling to tens of thousands of active voters requires a two-pronged approach: programmatic local expansion and horizontal topic diversification.
Right now, we focus heavily on high-level national breaking news. To hit massive scale, we are automating our multi-source ingestion engine to dynamically spin up regional and hyper-local "undercard matchups" (state, city, and district-level policy splits). People are incredibly passionate about issues directly affecting their immediate communities, and localized matchups will allow us to capture hundreds of thousands of niche, highly engaged voters simultaneously across separate, concurrent bouts.
Furthermore, we are building automated notifications and embeddable widgets. By allowing political subreddits, independent blogs, and civic organizations to cleanly embed a live BRAWLITICS bout directly into their own web properties, we can seamlessly pull their existing audience into our dual-perspective voting ecosystem without relying entirely on direct-to-site traffic.
With BRAWLITICS largely driven by multi-source news ingestion and daily voting loops, what is your primary strategy for acquiring new users and expanding your audience beyond early adopters?
Our growth strategy relies on turning our unpolluted data insights into highly shareable, organic distribution vectors.
Because traditional social media feeds thrive on division and biased polls, the clean, verifiably human data splits captured on BRAWLITICS are inherently valuable content. We are building sleek, data-rich infographic generators that allow users to instantly export a snapshot of a completed bout’s voting results directly to platforms like X, Reddit, and LinkedIn. When a user shares a balanced, side-by-side data split from our platform into a heated online debate, it acts as a high-conversion billboard for BRAWLITICS.
Beyond organic social loops, our secondary expansion track focuses on strategic syndication. We are engineering embeddable voting widgets that independent newsletters, political blogs, and civic organizations can drop directly into their content. By meeting news consumers exactly where they already read, we can seamlessly pull mainstream audiences into our dual-perspective ecosystem without relying on traditional, expensive ad spend.
Since BRAWLITICS forces users to read both Democratic and Republican stances before unlocking the voting pools, have you seen evidence or received feedback that this dual-perspective requirement has successfully shifted users' initial viewpoints on breaking news topics?
Absolutely. While shifting deep-seated, lifetime political ideologies overnight isn't our immediate goal, we are seeing fascinating behavioral evidence that the dual-perspective requirement is successfully breaking confirmation bias at a micro-level.
The most telling piece of feedback isn't necessarily users changing their minds entirely, but rather them acknowledging nuance where they previously saw none. We've received direct feedback from users stating that while they still voted within their traditional party alignment, reading the opposing "corner" made them realize the other side's argument wasn't just mindless opposition, but rooted in a completely different set of core values or structural priorities.
On a data level, we also closely track instances where a daily voting split doesn't perfectly align with typical national party line statistics. When a heavily partisan topic yields a surprisingly balanced or unexpected voting split on BRAWLITICS, it serves as strong quantitative evidence that forcing users to cleanly evaluate both policy angles before entering the pool is causing them to vote based on the merit of the specific argument rather than just pulling a partisan lever. It turns a reactive, emotional click into a deliberate, informed choice.
Bright Data: Bright Data is the leading web data infrastructure company, empowering over 20,000 organizations with ethical, scalable access to real-time public web information. From startups to industry leaders, we deliver the datasets that fuel AI innovation and real-world impact. Ready to unlock the web? Learn more at brightdata.com.
Neo4j: GraphRAG combines retrieval-augmented generation with graph-native context, allowing LLMs to reason over structured relationships instead of just documents. With Neo4j, you can build GraphRAG pipelines that connect your data and surface clearer insights. Learn more.
Storyblok: Storyblok is a headless CMS built for developers who want clean architecture and full control. Structure your content once, connect it anywhere, and keep your front end truly independent. API-first. AI-ready. Framework-agnostic. Future-proof. Start for free.
Algolia: Algolia provides a managed retrieval layer that lets developers quickly build web search and intelligent AI agents. Learn more.