Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.
Read more
World Rugby and England and Wales' governing bodies have sought to throw out nearly 380 former rugby union players' lawsuits over neurological injuries, arguing their lawyers repeatedly failed to disclose key medical evidence.
World Rugby, the Rugby Football Union (RFU) and the Welsh Rugby Union (WRU) are facing lawsuits from around 800 ex-amateur and professional players, who say repeated concussive and sub-concussive blows left them with serious neurological conditions.
The claimants' lawyers allege the governing bodies breached their duty of care by failing to protect them from those risks, but World Rugby argues in its written defence that it had no such duty and that injuries are an "inherent risk" in rugby.
The case began in 2022 but has been beset by delays over disclosure, as has a parallel action by ex-rugby league players.
World Rugby, the RFU and the WRU have now asked London's High Court to throw out claims brought by former rugby union players because their lawyers have breached court orders requiring them to provide records, including recordings of "neurology interviews" carried out before lawsuits began.
The Rugby Football League and the British Amateur Rugby League Association are similarly applying for around 130 ex-players' lawsuits to be thrown out.
Neil Block, a lawyer representing the RFU, told the court that "enough is enough".
"These are important documents ... an order was made that we were entitled to have them and we have tried in every way," he said.
Lawyers representing the claimants, however, say they have provided the vast majority of the documents required and that throwing out their claims would be an "extreme response".
"This litigation is of significant public interest and societal importance for the continuance of contact/collision sports in the UK," their lawyer Susan Rodway said in written arguments.
"It would be highly undesirable for a significant number of the former players to lose their claims on procedural grounds."
Reuters