Scalable quasi-pure MOF membranes for energy-efficient gas separations

Sholl, D. S. \& Lively, R. P. Seven chemical separations to change the world. Nature 532, 435–437 (2016).

Article
ADS
PubMed
Google Scholar
2. Zhou, S. et al. Asymmetric pore windows in MOF membranes for natural gas valorization. Nature 606, 706–712 (2022).

Article
ADS
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
3. Qian, Q. et al. MOF-based membranes for gas separations. Chem. Rev. 120, 8161–8266 (2020).

Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
4. Jiang, H., Alezi, D. \& Eddaoudi, M. A reticular chemistry guide for the design of periodic solids. Nat. Rev. Mater. 6, 466–487 (2021).

Article
CAS
Google Scholar
5. Lin, R.-B. et al. Molecular sieving of ethylene from ethane using a rigid metal–organic framework. Nat. Mater. 17, 1128–1133 (2018).

Article
ADS
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
6. Knebel, A. \& Caro, J. Metal–organic frameworks and covalent organic frameworks as disruptive membrane materials for energy-efficient gas separation. Nat. Nanotechnol. 17, 911–923 (2022).

Article
ADS
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
7. Zhou, S. et al. Electrochemical synthesis of continuous metal–organic framework membranes for separation of hydrocarbons. Nat. Energy 6, 882–891 (2021).

Article
ADS
CAS
Google Scholar
8. Knebel, A. et al. Solution processable metal–organic frameworks for mixed matrix membranes using porous liquids. Nat. Mater. 19, 1346–1353 (2020).

Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
9. Cadiau, A., Adil, K., Bhatt, P. M., Belmabkhout, Y. \& Eddaoudi, M. A metal-organic framework–based splitter for separating propylene from propane. Science 353, 137–140 (2016).

Article
ADS
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
10. Lai, H. W. H. et al. Hydrocarbon ladder polymers with ultrahigh permselectivity for membrane gas separations. Science 375, 1390–1392 (2022).

[Article](https://doi.org/10.1126%2Fscience.abl7163) 
[ADS](http://adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?link_type=ABSTRACT&bibcode=2022Sci...375.1390L) 
[CAS](/articles/cas-redirect/1:CAS:528:DC%2BB38XpvVyguro%3D) 
[PubMed](http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=35324307) 
[Google Scholar](http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?&title=Hydrocarbon%20ladder%20polymers%20with%20ultrahigh%20permselectivity%20for%20membrane%20gas%20separations&journal=Science&doi=10.1126%2Fscience.abl7163&volume=375&pages=1390-1392&publication_year=2022&author=Lai%2CHWH)

Luo, X. et al. Wrinkled metal-organic framework thin films with tunable Turing patterns for pliable integration. Science 385, 647–651 (2024).

Article
ADS
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
12. Peng, Y. et al. Metal-organic framework nanosheets as building blocks for molecular sieving membranes. Science 346, 1356–1359 (2014).

Article
ADS
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
13. Xu, L.-H. et al. Highly flexible and superhydrophobic MOF nanosheet membrane for ultrafast alcohol-water separation. Science 378, 308–313 (2022).

Article
ADS
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
14. Ma, X. et al. Zeolitic imidazolate framework membranes made by ligand-induced permselectivation. Science 361, 1008–1011 (2018).

Article
ADS
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
15. Zhou, S. et al. Paralyzed membrane: current-driven synthesis of a metal-organic framework with sharpened propene/propane separation. Sci. Adv. 4, eaau1393 (2018).

Article
ADS
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
16. Hou, Q., Zhou, S., Wei, Y., Caro, J. \& Wang, H. Balancing the grain boundary structure and the framework flexibility through bimetallic metal–organic framework (MOF) membranes for gas separation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142, 9582–9586 (2020).

CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
17. Zhao, Y. et al. Flexible polypropylene-supported ZIF-8 membranes for highly efficient propene/propane separation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142, 20915–20919 (2020).

Article
ADS
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
18. Liang, Y. et al. Large-area ultrathin metal–organic framework membranes fabricated on flexible polymer supports for gas separations. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 63, e202404058 (2024).

Article
CAS
Google Scholar
19. Ma, Q. et al. Ultrafast semi-solid processing of highly durable ZIF-8 membranes for propylene/propane separation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 132, 22093–22098 (2020).

Article
Google Scholar
20. Shu, L., Peng, Y., Zhu, C., Li, K. \& Yang, W. Metal-organic framework membranes with scale-like structure for efficient propylene/propane separation. Nat. Commun. 15, 10437 (2024).

Article
ADS
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
21. Dakhchoune, M. et al. Gas-sieving zeolitic membranes fabricated by condensation of precursor nanosheets. Nat. Mater. 20, 362–369 (2021).

Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
22. Chen, G. et al. Solid-solvent processing of ultrathin, highly loaded mixed-matrix membrane for gas separation. Science 381, 1350–1356 (2023).

Article
ADS
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
23. Datta, S. J. et al. Rational design of mixed-matrix metal-organic framework membranes for molecular separations. Science 376, 1080–1087 (2022).

Article
ADS
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
24. Tan, X. et al. Truly combining the advantages of polymeric and zeolite membranes for gas separations. Science 378, 1189–1194 (2022).

Article
ADS
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
25. Koros, W. J. \& Zhang, C. Materials for next-generation molecularly selective synthetic membranes. Nat. Mater. 16, 289–297 (2017).

Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
26. Napper, D. H. Polymeric Stabilization of Colloidal Dispersions (Academic Press, 1983).
27. de Gennes, P. G. Polymers at an interface; a simplified view. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 27, 189–209 (1987).

Article
Google Scholar
28. Lin, J.-B. et al. A scalable metal-organic framework as a durable physisorbent for carbon dioxide capture. Science 374, 1464–1469 (2021).

Article
ADS
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
29. Rodenas, T. et al. Metal–organic framework nanosheets in polymer composite materials for gas separation. Nat. Mater. 14, 48–55 (2015).

Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
30. Wei, R. et al. Carbon nanotube supported oriented metal organic framework membrane for effective ethylene/ethane separation. Sci. Adv. 8, eabm6741 (2022).

Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
31. Li, G., Zhang, H. \& Han, Y. Applications of transmission electron microscopy in phase engineering of nanomaterials. Chem. Rev. 123, 10728–10749 (2023).

Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
32. Zhang, D. et al. Atomic-resolution transmission electron microscopy of electron beam–sensitive crystalline materials. Science 359, 675–679 (2018).

Article
ADS
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
33. Zhang, H. et al. Three-dimensional inhomogeneity of zeolite structure and composition revealed by electron ptychography. Science 380, 633–638 (2023).

Article
ADS
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
34. Zhu, Y. et al. Unravelling surface and interfacial structures of a metal–organic framework by transmission electron microscopy. Nat. Mater. 16, 532–536 (2017).

Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
35. Ozcan, A. et al. Tuning MOF/polymer interfacial pore geometry in mixed matrix membrane for upgrading CO2 separation performance. Sci. Adv. 10, eadk5846 (2024).

Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
36. Wegst, U. G. K., Bai, H., Saiz, E., Tomsia, A. P. \& Ritchie, R. O. Bioinspired structural materials. Nat. Mater. 14, 23–36 (2015).

Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
37. Batatia, I. et al. A foundation model for atomistic materials chemistry. J. Chem. Phys. 163, 184110 (2025).

Article
ADS
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
38. Hjorth Larsen, A. et al. The atomic simulation environment—a Python library for working with atoms. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 29, 273002 (2017).

Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
39. Hafner, J. Ab-initio simulations of materials using VASP: density-functional theory and beyond. J. Comput. Chem. 29, 2044–2078 (2008).

Article
ADS
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
40. Grimme, S. Density functional theory with London dispersion corrections. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Comput. Mol. Sci. 1, 211–228 (2011).

Article
CAS
Google Scholar
41. Dudarev, S. L., Botton, G. A., Savrasov, S. Y., Humphreys, C. J. \& Sutton, A. P. Electron-energy-loss spectra and the structural stability of nickel oxide: an LSDA+U study. Phys. Rev. B 57, 1505–1509 (1998).

Article
ADS
CAS
Google Scholar
42. Limas, N. G. \& Manz, T. A. Introducing DDEC6 atomic population analysis: part 2. Computed results for a wide range of periodic and nonperiodic materials. RSC Adv. 6, 45727–45747 (2016).

Article
ADS
CAS
Google Scholar
43. Rappé, A. K., Casewit, C. J., Colwell, K. S., Goddard, W. A. III \& Skiff, W. M. UFF, a full periodic table force field for molecular mechanics and molecular dynamics simulations. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 114, 10024–10035 (1992).

Article
ADS
Google Scholar
44. Boyd, P. G., Moosavi, S. M., Witman, M. \& Smit, B. Force-field prediction of materials properties in metal-organic frameworks. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 8, 357–363 (2017).

Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
45. Thompson, A. P. et al. LAMMPS - a flexible simulation tool for particle-based materials modeling at the atomic, meso, and continuum scales. Comput. Phys. Commun. 271, 108171 (2022).

Article
CAS
Google Scholar
46. Abbott, L. J., Hart, K. E. \& Colina, C. M. Polymatic: a generalized simulated polymerization algorithm for amorphous polymers. Theor. Chem. Acc. 132, 1334 (2013).

Article
Google Scholar
47. Wang, J., Wolf, R. M., Caldwell, J. W., Kollman, P. A. \& Case, D. A. Development and testing of a general amber force field. J. Comput. Chem. 25, 1157–1174 (2004).

Article
ADS
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
48. Semino, R., Ramsahye, N. A., Ghoufi, A. \& Maurin, G. Microscopic model of the metal–organic framework/polymer interface: a first step toward understanding the compatibility in mixed matrix membranes. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 8, 809–819 (2016).

Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
49. Fan, D. et al. Is porosity at the MOF/polymer interface necessarily an obstacle to optimal gas-separation performances in mixed matrix membranes? ACS Mater. Lett. 3, 344–350 (2021).

Article
CAS
Google Scholar
50. Diaz-Marquez, A., Naskar, S., Fan, D., Eddaoudi, M. \& Maurin, G. MOF surface morphology governs interfacial pore architecture and CO2 dynamics in mixed matrix membranes. Chem. Sci. 16, 19519–19531 (2025).

Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
51. Yang, Q. \& Zhong, C. Molecular simulation of carbon dioxide/methane/hydrogen mixture adsorption in metal−organic frameworks. J. Phys. Chem. B. 110, 17776–17783 (2006).

Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
52. Martin, M. G. \& Siepmann, J. I. Transferable potentials for phase equilibria. 1. United-atom description of n-alkanes. J. Phys. Chem. B 102, 2569–2577 (1998).

Article
CAS
Google Scholar
53. Wells, B. A. \& Chaffee, A. L. Ewald summation for molecular simulations. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 11, 3684–3695 (2015).

Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
54. Peng, D.-Y. \& Robinson, D. B. A new two-constant equation of state. Ind. Eng. Chem. Fundam. 15, 59–64 (1976).

Article
CAS
Google Scholar
55. Nosé, S. A unified formulation of the constant temperature molecular dynamics methods. J. Chem. Phys. 81, 511–519 (1984).

Article
ADS
Google Scholar
56. Essmann, U. et al. A smooth particle mesh Ewald method. J. Chem. Phys. 103, 8577–8593 (1995).

Article
ADS
CAS
Google Scholar
57. Song, S. et al. Supplementary data for the paper “Scalable quasi-pure MOF membranes for energy-efficient gas separations”. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20067808 (2026).